The term “biohacking” has developed several definitions over the past several years. It has, however, increasingly come to refer to implanting of devices into one’s body in order to interface with technology. e.g. the implanting of microchips for payment and other services.
From my perspective, I really dislike this term, especially because many people in the technology arena are advocates of this practice. To me, it seems silly to take a word that typically has a negative connotation to people, like “hack”, and apply it to something you see as positive.
Regardless of the terminology, the real question lies in whether or not we should go down this path at all. The debates range from technological advancement and the natural progression of technology to moral questions and even apocalyptic omens. I’m not sure where you might fall in this, but for me, it is somewhere in the middle.
If you read my blogs at all, by now you should know that I love technology and have built my career around protecting people from the misuse of technology and trying to make to productive to increase the efficiency of our lives. While I do understand that there is a natural progression to anything, including technology, I do think we forget to ask ourselves if the next step is really one we should take.
According to a recent article from Hacker News, “Marketing solution provider Three Square Market (32M) has announced that it had partnered with Swedish biohacking firm BioHax International for offering implanted microchips to all their employees on 1st August, according to the company’s website. I encourage you to read this article and truly develop your own opinion on the subject as I think we will start to see this trending more and more.
As an IT professional, I totally see the benefits and security of this type of access control and monitoring. They refer in the article to things such as door and computer access as well as vending machine purchases. This is, in many ways, an IT Director’s dream. One of the first positives that I see is that we essentially are eliminating the need for passwords on our computers if the access is controlled via these devices. We, therefore, take the human element out of the equation of computer access which will always make IT people happy. Or will it? Let’s think about the new security concerns and other questions that will arise.
Security and other concerns:
- How do you handle these devices once the employee has moved on from the company? Do they keep it or do you have to have it removed? What is the expense either way?
- The devices use RFID to communicate. How easy are these devices and/or their frequencies to copy, manipulate, or duplicate?
- What are the long term health implications of these devices inside the body?
- Are there other health concerns such as pace makers, defibrillators, etc?
- Can the device or frequency be tracked off-premise or even via GPS?
These questions make up just a few of the concerns that will inevitably arise. As with the case of introducing any new technology, we introduce an entirely new set of concerns and avenues for security breaches, many of which we are unable to see until we have implemented said technology. Many times, it is near impossible to foresee all of the new issues and attack vectors that will arise from new technology implementation.
The hardest part for me is that I am such an advocate of new technology and where advancements are taking humanity. I appreciate them and usually “geek out” over them initially. However, I find myself having an ever-increasing reticence with things like biohacking and biometrics. On the surface, they seem to just provide convenience and more peace of mind. I contend, however, that many of these new technologies, especially authentication technologies, should be carefully examined and tested before implementation. If there is one thing history has taught us, it is that if someone wants into something bad enough, they will get in.
Some food for thought for us all I suppose . . .
Stay connected. Stay safe!